Ever since digital took hold in photography, photographers have desired a high-quality compact camera that could match the quality of their DSLRs when they wanted to travel light or work unobtrusively. While we’ve seen a series of compacts aimed at the serious photographer, only a handful have featured a sensor with the same physical APS-C size dimensions as those found in most DSLRs. And while it could look like Compact System Cameras would see off these high-end compacts, there’s a growing range of these niche compacts emerging.

The latest two APS-C sensor based compacts cameras are Fujifilm’s X100S, building on the success of the original X100 from two years ago, and the Nikon Coolpix A, which is their first APS-C premium compact.

Both feature fast, fixed lenses and almost identical resolutions, but have their own interpretations of what a photographer-focused premium compact should be, so which one comes out on top?

Fujifilm X100S

Fujifilm X100S front view

Read our full standalone review of the Fujifilm X100S


Key Specs

 Sensor – 16.3MP APS-C X-Trans CMOS
Output size – 4896 x 3264px
Lens – 23mm f/2
Focal length magnification- 1.5x
Shutter speeds – 30secs-1/4000sec, bulb
Max flash sync – 1/4000sec
ISO 200-6400 (Extendable to 100-25,600)
Drive mode – 6fps
Movie mode – Full HD (1920×1080) @ 60/30fps
Display – 2.8in, 460k-dot screen & Hybrid viewfinder
Field of view – 100%
Focus points 49
Dimensions – 126.5 x 74.4 x 53.9mm
Weight – 445g  


Superb lens and sensor combination; Hybrid viewfinder Handling characteristics


35mm lens might be a bit restrictive; AF still not quick in all situations Display could be better




Nikon COOLPIX A front view

Read our full standalone review of the Nikon COOLPIX A

Key Specs

 Sensor – 16.2MP APS-C CMOS
Output size – 4928 x 3264px
Lens – 18mm f/2.8
Focal length magnification – 1.5x
Shutter speeds – 30secs-1/2000sec, bulb
Max flash sync – TBC
ISO – 100-6400 (Extendable to 25,600)
Drive mode – 4fps
Movie mode – Full HD (1920×1080) @ 30/25/24fps
Display – 3in, 921k-dot screen
Field of view – 100%
Focus points – Multi-area
Dimensions – 111 x 64.3 x 40.3mm
Weight – 299g


Compact design; Excellent image quality; Simple menu system; Fantastic LCD screen


Slow focusing speed; No viewfinder; Minimum focus distance; No filter thread

Nikon COOLPIX A vs. Fujifilm X100S

Nikon COOLPIX A vs. Fujifilm X100S – How they compare

Both cameras offer a decent amount of features overall, but the Fujifilm X100S has the edge here thanks to the Hybrid viewfinder. It makes composition much more pleasurable than holding at arms length, though we have to say that the Nikon Coolpix A has the bigger and better of the two rear displays.

Moving on to the optics and both models offer high-quality fixed focal-length lenses and the one you’ll take preference over will depend a lot on what you like to shoot. The Nikon Coolpix A, with its wider 28mm is more suited to landscape and architectural shooters who want to get more into the frame, while the slightly more narrower field-of-view offered by the Fujifilm X100S, and the slightly faster maximum aperture, mean it’ll lend itself to a broader range of subjects. That’s not forgetting the optional 28mm wideangle conversion lens available for the Fujifilm X100S, while the also optional lens hood also means 49mm filters can be attached for greater creative shooting.

Taking each camera’s form factor into consideration, and the Nikon Coolpix A is the more compact – as we’ve said, it’ll fit easily into a jacket pocket, so is great if you always want to travel with a high-quality camera by your side. The Fujifilm X100S is quite a bit bigger, but has the benefit of a built-in viewfinder, while the retro, rangefinder-inspired design is much more pleasing than the somewhat forgettable Nikon Coolpix A, with a design more in-keeping with a much more affordable compact, rather than its own asking price.

Nikon COOLPIX A vs. Fujifilm X100S review sample image gallery 

Nikon COOLPIX A vs. Fujifilm X100S review full sample image gallery

Nikon COOLPIX A vs. Fujifilm X100S – Image quality

With both models featuring APS-C CMOS sensors, you’re not going to be disappointed with the results from either. Out of the two, and the Fujifilm X100S just nudges the Nikon Coolpix A when it comes to ultimate resolution, with the X-Trans CMOS sensor from Fujifilm showing why its become a favourite among professionals. It’s worth noting though that both cameras, with the loss of AA filters for improved detail, did suffer from moiré in some instances, such as our architectural shots on the previous pages. Overall though and both cameras deliver images comparable results to most DSLRs.

Nikon COOLPIX A vs. Fujifilm X100S – Verdict

Of the two cameras, our choice would be the Fujifilm X100S. Don’t get us wrong, the Nikon Coolpix A does a lot of things very well, while the size and 28mm lens while see it be a natural pick for some, but it can’t quite match other overall performance, image quality and charm of the Fujifilm X100S.

When spending a four-figure sum on a compact, you want it to be a bit special, and next to the Fujifilm X100S, the Nikon Coolpix A just can’t compete, with its safe design treatment seeing it melt away into the background alongside the desirable-looking Fujifilm X100S.

It’s not just how it looks as the Fujifilm X100S eclipse the Nikon Coolpix A in other areas too. With the no-fuss, traditional hands-on controls, built-in viewfinder and intuitive controls, the Fujifilm X100S feels much more complete and more like a photographers camera than the Coolpix A manages to achieve, while the X-Trans CMOS sensor delivers stunning results.

  1. 1. Introduction
  2. 2. Nikon COOLPIX A vs. Fujifilm X100S
Page 1 of 2 - Show Full List
  • D.Bosch

    I have to agree, fuji x100s looks incredible and desirable, Nikon Coolpix A looks like $79.99 point and shoot camera on sale.- minimum 3 people are at fault in Nikon for that less then mediocre look, person who designed it, person who approved it and a person who could but said nothing.

    Anyway is it me or the first architectural shot of ceiling looks much sharper on Coolpix A? X100s version looks blurry. was tripod used?

  • Dennis

    Sorry guys, IMO it’s the Nikon which delivers the better image quality, there’s just more clearance in its images, as I see it. Compare image 5: The Ferrari’s front wheel, the letters on the brake calliper! Or above the hotel entrance, the balcony balustrade!
    If I’d be sure to get along with the attachable viewfinder, I’d prefer the Nikon. You could combine it with a second camera and a normal lens or a short tele lens (or a zoom).

  • artHarris

    You should at least mention the Sony RX-100. Altho’ not APS-C sized captor, it is bigger than normal for a compact camera, in a smaller lighter body, with a zoom lens and 22Mpixels and half the price.