Confused about depth of field? What Digital Camera examines what the term means and the factors which affect depth of field

## What is depth of field?

Depth of field describes the range of distances in an image within which objects are deemed acceptably in focus. A lens only focuses on one particular distance, but by changing the depth of field it is possible to decide whether what’s behind and in front of this point is also comes into focus.

Image: An aperture of f/4 was used to isolate just a few of these models from the rest. Taking the image at an angle has also restricted depth of field.

## What affects depth of field

Knowing what affects – and therefore, how to control – depth of field is important, as it allows the photographer to place emphasis on particular subjects within a scene. Portraits, for example, benefit from shallow depth of field where focus is placed only on the subject, so the photographer will typically take steps to isolate them from other elements. Conversely, landscapes usually require the opposite effect, in order to make sure everything in both the foreground and far away into the distance is rendered sharply.

## How you can change depth of field

There are three main ways in which a photographer can change depth of field:

### Aperture

Images: Aperture, f.2.8, f5.6, f11. The effects of using different apertures on the same subject. Depth of field expands as the aperture becomes smaller.

As a general rule, at any given focal length the smaller the aperture the greater the depth of field.

Larger apertures correspond with smaller f-numbers, such as f/2.8 and f/4, while smaller apertures correspond with larger numbers. Therefore, an aperture of f/4 will provide a substantially shallower depth of field than an aperture of f/16, providing all other conditions remains the same.

### Focus Point

Depth of field within an image also depends on the point of focus.

The rule here is that focusing further into the distance results in greater depth of field than focusing close-up. However, as the focus point moves further away, the ratios of acceptable focus in front of and behind the subject also change. Whereas the two are roughly equal when shooting close up, as the point of focus moves further into the distance depth of field increases behind the subject to a greater degree than it does in front of it.

### Lens

It is often written that shorter focal lengths produce more depth of field than longer ones, and to a degree this is true.

It is, however, contested by those who claim that differences only arise because of changes in magnification. Two images taken so that a subject fills the same proportion of the frame may be taken by two lenses with different focal lengths, but the picture taken with the wider lens needs to be taken closer to the subject or else the subject will be recorded too small. However, while this will create two images with subjects of the same size, the area behind the subject (if we assume that it is only the subject which is focused) will appear different, mainly because the wideangle lens has a greater field of view.

The result is that the wider lens appears to render an image with a sharper background, as the subjects in the background are smaller. If we assume that these subjects in each image are as sharp as each other, the details within the wideangle image will still appear sharper as they aren’t as magnified – and close examination of two such images shows this to be the case.

So, while some changes are to be expected between different lenses, the actual difference in terms of sharpness between the same two areas is likely to be negligible.

Image: An aperture of f/11 has provided enough depth of field to to maintain sharpness in both the foreground and background of this image.

## What else affects depth of field?

The type of camera used also needs to be taken into account, as the size of its sensor affects depth of field. A compact camera with a relatively small sensor will produce greater depth if field than an APS-C or full-frame camera. In some situations this is beneficial, although for other subjects a photographer will require the shallower depth of field (and greater control over it in general) that is offered by a camera with a larger sensor.

So if the photographer requires complete front-to-back sharpness, why not simply use the smallest aperture possible?

There are two reasons against doing so, the main one being an effect most noticeable at smaller apertures known as diffraction. Diffraction is caused by the wave nature of light, and how its behaviour changes when it passes either through an aperture or against the edge of a subject. Past a particular aperture the effects of diffraction will outweigh the larger depth of field, and so will cause the image to lose sharpness and definition.

The other reason is that it isn’t always practical to use a smaller aperture, as decreasing apertures requires an increase in shutter speed. This is less of a concern when using a tripod, but when sufficient depth of field may be obtained at a larger aperture, using it sidesteps the detrimental effects diffraction has on an image.

## Depth of Focus

Depth of focus and depth of field are two separate terms, which should not be confused.

Whereas depth of field describes the area around the subject which is in focus, depth of focus is a measurement of how far the sensor can be moved away from the optimum point of focus, and still produce an acceptably sharp image.

## Working it out

If your photography requires critical control over depth of field, you may benefit from a depth of field guide. These come in a number of forms, such as online depth of field calculators where you can input all variables, to tools such as the ExpoAperture2 Depth of Field Guide. It’s even possible to print off charts specifically for your camera/lens combination from certain websites. If you have an iPhone, you may also download depth of field calculators through the App Store.

• Nigel Atherton (Editor)

Chester, you’re right in that the wording on this page wasn’t clear enough. It wasn’t wrong, it just wasn’t made explicit that we meant at an EQUIVALENT focal length. We should have been more precise with our wording. In fact whenever we mention focal length we’re almost always refering to 35mm equivalent focal length, as with so many sensor sizes out there talking about actual focal lengths in any comparisons is pretty meaningless on its own.

• Thomas R Hall

Sound advice to a 78 year old like me
Just learning but I like getting the Knowledge.

• ECM

I didn’t understand any of that and have lost the will to live and I have a PhD.

• Chester

Some confusion about sensor size and depth of field, I think. Depth of field is a function of lens focal length, lens aperture and â€˜acceptable focusâ€™ only. Even WDC get this wrong: on page 67 of the September issue, where depth of field on full frame and APS-C sized sensors in Canon cameras are compared, WDC says a full frame sensor â€˜offers a shallower depth of field at any given focal lengthâ€™, when what they mean to say is â€˜offers a shallower depth of field at any given relative focal lengthâ€™. Thus a 50mm lens at f8 will give the same depth of field when focused on 3 metres on any camera, whatever the sensor size, but a 31mm lens at f8 on an APC-C sensor camera when focused on 3 metres will be the equivalent of a 50mm lens on a full frame sensor camera, but will offer greater depth of field because it is a shorter focal length lens. This is why compact cameras, with tiny sensors and correspondingly very short focal length lenses have a great depth of field most of the time. Alternatively, for a given angle of view, the larger the sensor size the longer the lens focal length required, so the less depth of field at a particular f-stop and focus distance