Kodak ESP Office 6150 Printer
Review Date : Sat, 5 Jun 2010
Author : Matt Tuffin
A small office printer that offers some superb features
| Pros: | Plenty of connectivity options, cheap cartridges |
|---|---|
| Cons: | Very expensive, mediocre print quality |
The Kodak ESP Office 6150 is a small business printer with multiple connectivity possibilities, from wireless networking to operating as a fax machine. There's also a built in scanner for archiving prints or copying documents as well as the opportunity for double sided printing.
The printer relies on a four colour single ink cartridge and can print an A4 photograph in around 2 minutes, which is quite slow compared to the average dedicated photo printer. Scans can be acquired at 1200 DPI simultaneously with the Kodak software creating separate files from the results. This bulk processing alludes to the printer's main intended usage of being a small office hub rather than connected to a single computer. Both the wi-fi and Ethernet connectivity are becoming more commonplace among printers although being able to plug into a phoneline and operate as a fax is certainly more business-orientated. The likes of a 300 page auto feeder and 200 page sheet feeder aren't particularly useful for wanting to churn out the odd photo print, nor is fax connectivity. The fact that the printer is missing a direct card reader and standard USB port for PictBridge connection is quite frustrating from this standpoint, as even small businesses would appreciate the ability to connect a USB stick or memory card.
In spite of clearly not being a photo printer in it's primary application, the ESP 6150 still has more than enough attributes to produce a decent colour photo printout. The quality produced wasn't quite up to the standard of a dedicated photo printer, being quite over-saturated and lacking any real depth of colour. Flesh tones showed the largest issues in the contrast, as any redder patches seemed utterly removed from paler areas. Sharpness is excellent though, showing clearly defined lines and few fuzzy edges.
Verdict
A small office printer that isn't quite up to photographic needs





Have your say!
Latest comments
December 10 11:55
Mike Freewill
How you can give this more than 50% is beyond me. Dreadful quality, dreadful running costs, dreadful print quality. Far far better Epson, Canon and HP's out there. You lose credibility giving this a positive review
February 15 01:22
Carol Kalinich
Not happy with this printer at all. My old Kodak works better than this one. Ink is cheap, scanning is terrible, wasted about 50 sheets of paper until the document came out correct, doesn't print as the picture shows, will not store faxes im memory, I have auto answer on and If I'm not in front of it to press the start button, I miss the fax. First printer lasted 4 days and had to be replaced, tried to fax and it ate my documents, two little plastic tabs were coming loose under the lid. The tech had no clue as to what I was saying, he told me to pull the plastic out, NOT!! Just not happy at all with this printer, the only pro is the ink.