Pentax K-m review
Value for Money
Due to the similarities of the K-m and the K200D, it seems fair to draw a comparison between their prices. The K200D launched with a price tag of about £550 back in June 2008. At the time, the K200D was marketed as an ‘entry-level’ camera, but with a host of features from its more advanced K20D stablemate. However, the same camera has now appeared in the shape of the slightly smaller K-m, and this is offered for around £340 for the camera and kit lens.
When you consider the launch list price of each, you can only conclude that the K-m represents fantastic value, even at its RRP. It is not often that you can say that, these days, given that new cameras often start expensive before falling to a more realistic price within weeks of launch. The K-m has already dropped in price by a fair amount since it was launched, and if this continues to happen then it will represent even better value.
Have your say!
Latest comments
July 02 20:59
Paul Collins
I'm very happy with the KM, I use Sigma lens and a Ricoh 50mm superb
January 11 20:31
Tom
I want to take up photography. Would you say this is a good SLR to start on? I noticed the review stated it was. I like the idea that it improves photography but don't want to find it too challenging as a starter. Thanks
July 02 19:52
keith graves
As with Tom, I'm looking for an affordable lightweight DSLR mainly for close ups- will this do it? Also, I 'm worried about the AA batteries - have always had short battery life with non-lithium, hows this one?
January 10 01:29
Brad
Keith I have a Pentax ist DS and I have used the AA Lithium in it and they lasted 6 month. I tried the non-Lithium and they didn't seem to last too long. You can use them in a pinch. I'm going to buy the rechargeable ones and see how they do.