Olympus FE-4000 review

You are absolutely right! I was stupid enough to buy this camera (called x-920). if want to take a picture of a person, the must either be sleeping or dead, or you will not get the shot you want. Photographing moving objects faster than a turtle? Forget it!

This camera is incapable of a good picture even with open light and a stand. It is the worst camera I have ever bought.

First of all, when you decide to buy such camera you should keep in your mind that you're gonna buy cheap camer so don't expect very much from it, but you first compare its features and advantages with its prize. For me, it quite good camera, very handy, very slim, easy to use and to handle, has longlife battery, good sound stabilization, takes wonderful picture in sunny open area and landscapes, perfect pictures in indoor (night), very bad picture in open (night) but it still better than corsponding camera like LUMIX, SAMSUNG but not sony cyber shot nor canon,

yarko, are you kidding? This camera is awful compared to Lumix cameras - Panasonic arguably make the best compact stills cameras on the market. If you had the knowledge of a side by side comparison then you'd see the difference.

Hey Fred, my bro has Lumix 10,1mp and friend of mine has olympus x920, my bro bought his camera with 165 euros while my friend bought his camera with 90 euros, when I compare the pictures I didnät find any significant difference expcept photos taken at night, phots taken by olympus far better than lumix. The only thing that make people angry and misjudge and biased is the shape and components of olympus which is very simple slim, and has awful screen, while lumix and samsung have fancy screena nd structure. But for me, I don't give damn, the most important thing (in my opinion) is the quality of the picture which is almost same as in LUMIX10,1mp or SAMSUNG12,2mp. thx