canon-sx1_sony-hx1_head2head.jpg

The term ‘compact camera’ perhaps doesn’t justify or explain the sheer technological advancement that both the Canon SX1 and Sony HX1 adhere to – they essentially are, at least by gesture given their considerable stature, compact cameras, but rather more ones that wrap up the highest-end technology available at this level. In fact, as well as the notable 20x optical zoom (28-560mm equivalent) lenses, there’s so much crammed into each of these products that the price point actually sails above and beyond that of some entry-level DSLR cameras. So just what do you get for your money and, given the apparent similarities between the pair, which one comes out as top pick of the two?

Canon SX1 IS vs Sony HX1 – Features

Both the Sony and Canon are weighty compacts – both in physical stature and on the features-front too. With a 20x optical zoom lens, a range from a wide 28mm through to telephoto 560mm (equivalent) is at your disposal, and that’s something really quite special. Neither skimp on the lens-front either, as the optical image stabilisation – Canon’s titled ‘IS‘ and Sony’s branded ‘SteadyShot‘ – provides assurance of sharp images in low light and, crucially here, when using longer focal lengths. High Definition movie recording is very much flavour of 2009, and neither model misses the pulse on this front – Full HD 1080p at 30 frames per second with stereo audio capture (though no 3.5mm external mic input) is a mainstay in both bodies, with the Canon’s one-touch record button making things that little bit swifter.

So far, so similar, but differences do begin to creep in. The Sony HX1 has a tilt-angle 3in LCD screen, with the more conventional 4:3 aspect ratio. The Canon SX1, however, has a vari-angle 2.8in 16:9 widescreen LCD which means it can rotate through all the angles – to face the photographer, the floor, or even the subject. Then there’s the Sony’s mind-bogglingly clever Sweep Panorama mode – a scene mode which, rather than stitching multiple single frames together one by one, simply takes a full single sweeping 180° panorama in one take as the camera is rotated and then presents a final, coherent panorama within seconds. It’s a lot of fun and extremely effective. Uniquely of the two, the Canon has a WL-DC300 remote control in its box – allowing zooming, shooting and menu options to all be addressed from afar. And, should you want to get really clever, the SX1 has a hotshoe that is compatible with Canon Speedlites, placing a whole new world of creative lighting at your fingertips should you splash a bit of extra cash on flash kit – quite the bonus compared to the Sony’s on-board-only flash.

Canon SX1 IS vs Sony HX1 – Design

Both cameras have a similar physical design, with a chunky grip to the right for sturdy hold. The Sony is marginally smaller though and, in this instance, it doesn’t necessarily work to its advantage as things feel a tad more cramped; in particular the buttons on the back will leave larger hands brushing up against the raised LCD screen’s edge.

The LCD screens themselves are also wildly different – the tilt-angle of the Sony HX1’s 3in screen provides vertical movement to face directly up or down or any measure in between, while the Canon’s vari-angle covers every angle, not just the vertical. However, while the latter may sound like an improvement, the 16:9 widescreen format just isn’t a traditional stills photographic ratio, which perplexes a little. It’s certainly a cinematic tradition, and while HD movie mode does feature, this being a stills camera it seems an oddity to have opted for such a fixed design feature, plus it limits the size to a smaller 2.8in.

The button-arrangement and menu functions also differ considerably on both cameras, with the Sony’s menu system following suit with all other Cyber-shot cameras and the Canon’s providing a more complex yet accessible multi-tiered system. Digging through the Sony’s menus is easy, but the Canon’s simpler offering with quick access functions and even a multitude of additional physical buttons provide the better solution. The SX1 has a rotational thumbwheel-type d-pad which will, much like Marmite’s long standing message, be something you’ll either click with and love or find annoyingly fiddly and hate. The HX1 has a more DSLR-like rear control wheel on the rear that also acts as a button for selecting and running through options.

Being such power-hungry beasts, it’s good to see that both Canon and Sony have opted for CMOS sensors, which tend to consume less juice. However, in the HX1’s box you’ll find a li-ion battery and charger, compared to the notable lack in the Canon’s. Instead you’ll have to fork out extra cash to replace 4xAA batteries once they run out – a greater expense on an already expensive camera, and a power-type that may not be preferred by some. There isn’t so much as the option for a li-ion battery in the SX1 either, nor an AA-battery option in the HX1. This is very much down to a personal preference.

  1. 1. Canon SX1 IS vs Sony HX1 - Features
  2. 2. Canon PowerShot SX1 IS vs Sony Cyber-shot HX1: Performance
  3. 3. Canon PowerShot SX1 IS vs Sony Cyber-shot HX1: Image Quality and Verdict
Page 1 of 3 - Show Full List
  • Hans Knijff

    page 3 is missing

  • brian

    I bought a Canon SX1is earlier this year and returned it after finding the image quality rubbish in any lighting apart from very sunny weather.
    The noise above 200iso made the images unusable and i expected much better from Canon but it seems to be going backwards in the camera market what with the latest 7D ghosting problems etc they need to spend more time developing and testing before rushing to launch them onto the general public as they are doing more bad than good and many people are choosing other brands over Canon due to their increasingly poor IQ.
    I eventually went for a Fuji S100fs which is in another league compared to the Sx1is ok zoom isn’t a big and doesn’t have HD video but It runs rings around it in IQ and is the Only Bridge camera that can compare to a DSLR.
    Unfortunatly Fuji has replaced the S100fs with an inferior model the S200EXR and having tested one myself find it to be more like the Canon for high noise at low iso’s so I definatly wouldn’t buy the S200EXR and will probably go for a Panasonic or even Nikon/Sony before returning to Canon.
    Shame really as i have been a Canon addict for many years but not anymore!