buying advice please EOS 650 or D 5200?
Hi and apologies if this or similar questions have been asked before I am new to the forum!
I have had 'old' SLR cameras before (Pentax) and then switched to digital some years back, having gone through compacts, zooms and bridge cameras never really feeling satisfied with the results I am going to buy a DSLR. The price and specifications now seem much more appealing and I have more time to 'play' with toys!
I currently have a couple of olympus digitals about 5 years old and a slightly newer panasonic lumix which is ok, but I find all of them a bit slow and limited, having to change cameras sometimes to get decent results, none of these cameras is very good for action / sports.
I have done a little research and playing in shops and have decided between the canon EOS 650d and the Nikon D5200, I keep getting pushed towards the EOS650 by salesmen who are admittedly canon fans and havent used a D5200 so they are biased.
We need an all round camera for the family, my wife is involved in crafting & baking so needs flexibility to alter depth of field and macro use while I will use it for sport and general family & landscape stuff.
My budget is flexible at around £500 plus for a camera (basic kit) and I can spend another £250 or so on a telephoto lens to get us under way hence my choice of the above.
I have seen the canon EOS650D for around £450 with 18-55 lens and the Nikon 5200 for £600 so both on budget.
any input very welcome!
I am not complete novice but will need to re-learn a lot due to the lazy compacts I have been using so want something I can use straight away but 'grow' with also.
Hi Smick welcome to the forum.
I was looking at the Nikon d5200 before I got my D7000. The 5200 is an upgrade from the 5100 with a few modifications ( mainly internal) . The first is 24 mega pixel sensor I thought it was the same as in the D3200 but Nikon say it's improved. If you are looking to do macro the higher resolution will be a great asset.
The second upgrade is borrowed from the D7000 which is a 39 point focusing system. I find this outstanding on my d7000.
Rather than going for the 18 55 kit lens I would look at the sigma 17- 70 os lens it's a wee bit faster, a wee but sharper with a wee bit more zoom, it can also do macro although it's not a true macro it does give good results.
Both Nikon and Canon make great cameras and no matter which one you select it will give great results. Hope this helps ... Graham
Hi Graham, Thanks very much for the input, I am really leaning towards the Nikon as it also seems less confusing with lenses (DX) that are what they say they are rather than compensating factors etc being applied to the canon, I realise thats only a small point !
And I had a play with the EOS touch screen and found that it was a bit distracting and I ended up chasing the subject and messing about with settings too much and the subject had gone!
I thought this was just me being unused to it but the salesman was the same !
Not many shop staff seem to be Nikon friendly really, they all seem to push Canon which is fine as they are great cameras but the Nikon does seem a level up on specs and is newer so will last as a model that bit longer?
Perhaps its too new to get some real feedback?
I also have a panasonic digital camcorder so movies aren't really going to be a factor however if the camera I buy is good enough for short clips that would be a real plus & the Nikon seems ahead again?
Also on the subject of lenses there seems to be a very similar amount out there for both but due to price I think I would be limited to buying say 2 lenses to give me my required coverage, are the Sigma & Tamron equivalents as good on image and focus quality / speed as Canon/Nikon own systems? is there anything to watch out for? I had a look on the sigma website and they seem to cover just about everything!
hi as you have done the going to the shop bit and looking then its now down to personnel choice. one thing get right is that an canon ef lens will fit any canon DSLR the efs lenses only fit the aps-c sensors ie the 650d 60d 7d. i would looik at ken rockwells guide to the nikon fit lenses as a canon shooter i am biased. so as said before its now down to personnel choice
that simplifies things, so canon do EFS for the APC sensor range and Nikon do the DX for their APC range, like for like !
theres one thing that stands out, Canon users are generally very happy with their kit as they recommend and stand by them which says a lot.
It seems to come down to whether I want to spend the extra £150 on the Nikon or use it to get an extra lens for the Canon.
I have had a play with the 3100 but in both shops they didn't have a 5200 to play with which is a shame. When it comes to it I expect the kit is going to set me back around £600 - £800 so I want to make an informed choice as I can.
I have waited for a while now and you cant wait forever! prices will come down and specs will go up thats inevitable, I think now is a good time to buy.
I really liked the Pentax K30 due to the weather proofing and slight increased FPS rate but was put off by salesman blag and there seems to be a lot less lenses and accessories out there, also resale should i move on would likely be a lot less.
Thanks very much for all the input, I am looking to buy in the next week or 2.
Sigma / Tamron lenses are of very good quality. They used to be just cheap versions but have got there act together and now produce really well made quality lenses.
i have a few Sigmas ( wide angle, and a 105 macro) and a Tamron which is a 28- 70mm this lens is great for landscapes and as a walk about lens.
I'm not a keen video user but the 5200 does 1080 standard videos and has a built in mic, sorry I don't have a clue about the sound quality. Please let us know what you decide on... Graham