Skip to Content
Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Community >> News - Discussion
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
CSBC
News Editor


Reged: 24/11/2006
Posts: 689
A third of MPs back photo campaign
      #674099 - 03/07/2008 11:00

AP News

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
beejaybee
Marvin


Reged: 18/07/2007
Posts: 4245
Loc: Really Here In Name Only
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: CSBC]
      #674181 - 03/07/2008 14:58

Do we therefore take it that two thirds don't, or do we just assume ignorance and/or the usual can't-be-bothereditis on behalf of the majority?

Where can we find out if our MP needs his or her arm twisting?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BenchistaModerator
Wich Tyler


Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 36433
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: beejaybee]
      #674188 - 03/07/2008 15:18

Here. My MP hadn't, so I've emailed him...

--------------------
Nick

www.nbrphoto.com

Light and Shade II - the new blog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark101
addict


Reged: 15/03/2007
Posts: 439
Loc: Lincolnshire
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: beejaybee]
      #674190 - 03/07/2008 15:17

I love the bit about local police being able to make local decisions, according to the Home Office Minister. The Police are as much bound by the law as the public. In other words they can't make arbitrary decisions or interpret the law for their own ends. Only Parliament can make laws and only courts can interpret the laws. You can be done for obstruction in some circumstances, but refusing to stop taking pictures when ordered to do so by a police officer would eventually land the officer in more trouble than the person taking the pictures if the matter went to court.

Sadly the Home office minister does not seem to understand the principles on which law in the UK works. The command of a police officer is not the word of god or the law, he is simply there to enforce the existing laws.

In other words the Home Office Minister needs pulling down a peg or two.

--------------------
Cavyslave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BenchistaModerator
Wich Tyler


Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 36433
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: Mark101]
      #674195 - 03/07/2008 15:41

Quote:

I love the bit about local police being able to make local decisions, according to the Home Office Minister. The Police are as much bound by the law as the public. In other words they can't make arbitrary decisions or interpret the law for their own ends. Only Parliament can make laws and only courts can interpret the laws. You can be done for obstruction in some circumstances, but refusing to stop taking pictures when ordered to do so by a police officer would eventually land the officer in more trouble than the person taking the pictures if the matter went to court.

Sadly the Home office minister does not seem to understand the principles on which law in the UK works. The command of a police officer is not the word of god or the law, he is simply there to enforce the existing laws.

In other words the Home Office Minister needs pulling down a peg or two.




Er, try reading what he said. He most categorically didn't say anything like what you're accusing him of, as we debated at the time. At no point is he saying that the police can "make arbitrary decisions or interpret the law for their own ends" - he's simply pointing out the fact that in some cases, local decisions mean that photography isn't allowed, which is absolutely true - he's talking about schools, for example, banning photography, which they are perfectly at liberty to do (however daft those bans might be!). Yes, he's not worded it very well, but to interpret it as you have simply isn't justified by his words.

--------------------
Nick

www.nbrphoto.com

Light and Shade II - the new blog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mark101
addict


Reged: 15/03/2007
Posts: 439
Loc: Lincolnshire
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: Benchista]
      #674214 - 03/07/2008 16:32

We all I can say if that he didn't make it very clear -

'There is no general restriction on photography in public places, and there is no presumption of privacy for individuals in a public place. However, decisions may be made locally to restrict photography, for example, to protect children, or at organised events.'

Schools are private property and any event organized on private property would be covered. Well that goes without saying - He should say what he means in plain english then is all I can say, because an organised event in the street would not be enforeable. Talk about going around the houses, typical politician.

--------------------
Cavyslave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BenchistaModerator
Wich Tyler


Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 36433
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: Mark101]
      #674219 - 03/07/2008 16:39

Quite. I suspect he only said what he did to cover his backside, but he made a pig's ear of it. As you say, typical politician...

--------------------
Nick

www.nbrphoto.com

Light and Shade II - the new blog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
chris000
veteran


Reged: 30/11/2005
Posts: 1240
Loc: Wiltshire, UK
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: Benchista]
      #674272 - 03/07/2008 18:49

Pleased to see that my local MP has signed up - I usually regard him as a bit of a donkey, but at least he got this right

--------------------
Chris

The most beautiful thing under the Sun is being under the Sun - Christa Wolfe

www.chriswaldrenphotography.co.uk


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Sir_Alien
newbie


Reged: 17/05/2005
Posts: 2
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: beejaybee]
      #675568 - 07/07/2008 12:13

I would agree with this point. 2/3rd's are either not supportive of public photography, couldn't care less or have not taken any public opinion one way or another.

My MP is on the list which is good but that means the majority are not presently behind Mitchell.



Quote:

Do we therefore take it that two thirds don't, or do we just assume ignorance and/or the usual can't-be-bothereditis on behalf of the majority?

Where can we find out if our MP needs his or her arm twisting?




Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TimF
Senior Member


Reged: 30/07/2001
Posts: 15970
Loc: Herts/Beds border
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: beejaybee]
      #677512 - 11/07/2008 10:12

Quote:

Do we therefore take it that two thirds don't, or do we just assume ignorance and/or the usual can't-be-bothereditis on behalf of the majority?

Where can we find out if our MP needs his or her arm twisting?



at www.tinyurl.com/4ww64z Get on their asses people.

--------------------
Tim BSRIPN


The camera makes everyone a tourist in other people's reality, and eventually in one's own - Susan Sontag


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
RonM



Reged: 26/04/2001
Posts: 3663
Loc: Scotland
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: TimF]
      #678207 - 12/07/2008 23:13

Like Nick my own representative hadn't signed up so he's been e-mailed, however I don't hold out much hope, the tw*t is a government minister

--------------------
Ron NRIPN
Everyone has a photographic memory, some don't have Film or Digital Memory.
Life is a Learning Opportunity


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ephemeral
addict


Reged: 21/07/2007
Posts: 500
Loc: North East England
Re: A third of MPs back photo campaign [Re: RonM]
      #678248 - 13/07/2008 10:05

Alan Milburn doesn't think it is the best way to represent his constituents

laughable really

--------------------
Earth, Sky, Sun - www.earthskysun.com

Image Gallery for Forumites if you want to store your pics without ads PM me for details



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BenchistaModerator
Wich Tyler


Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 36433
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
Name and shame - Jeremy Wright MP [Re: Ephemeral]
      #678459 - 14/07/2008 09:07

I'll get round to posting my MPs response, but the brief version is that he hasn't heard of the problem and isn't prepared to undermine the police by signing this EDM. I had thought that he was a good constituency MP, but it appears not.

--------------------
Nick

www.nbrphoto.com

Light and Shade II - the new blog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
NorthernNikon
Bulls Hitter


Reged: 16/12/2005
Posts: 5316
Loc: Harrogate, North Yorks
Re: Name and shame - Jeremy Wright MP [Re: Benchista]
      #678473 - 14/07/2008 09:30

Quote:

I'll get round to posting my MPs response, but the brief version is that he hasn't heard of the problem and isn't prepared to undermine the police by signing this EDM. I had thought that he was a good constituency MP, but it appears not.




My response would be that for him not to have heard of the issue shows a remarkable lack of awareness seeing as it has been well publicised. Even so, a small amount of research on his part (or whichever member of his family is in his pay) would allow him to make an informed opinion rather than merely not supporting an EDM on the basis of ignorance. I might also add that the letter was being copied to the local press, selected national press and media, the party leader, the party chairman, and also the leaders and chairmen of the other two major parties.

--------------------
www.BarneyAllen.com the new home of ComicShots.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BenchistaModerator
Wich Tyler


Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 36433
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
Re: Name and shame - Jeremy Wright MP [Re: NorthernNikon]
      #678500 - 14/07/2008 10:21

That's pretty much what I had thought to do. Clearly he thinks it's some lefty conspiracy, which must be why it's been signed by such noted left-wing radicals as Michael Ancram, Ann Widdecombe, Nicholas Soames.......

--------------------
Nick

www.nbrphoto.com

Light and Shade II - the new blog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
bench_ubbster
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 08/08/2006
Posts: 2546
Loc: Cambridgeshire, UK
Re: Name and shame - Jeremy Wright MP [Re: Benchista]
      #678683 - 14/07/2008 20:42

Jonathan Djanogly.

Here he is, the one on the right, a bit more in focus than Brucie



--------------------
Master of the Bench and Global Ambassador of the Brotherhood of the Bench
Bench or No Bench


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
TimF
Senior Member


Reged: 30/07/2001
Posts: 15970
Loc: Herts/Beds border
Re: Name and shame - Jeremy Wright MP [Re: bench_ubbster]
      #680194 - 18/07/2008 09:47

BJP readers will be aware that this issue has been raised in the Lords - see here for details.

--------------------
Tim BSRIPN


The camera makes everyone a tourist in other people's reality, and eventually in one's own - Susan Sontag


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Ephemeral
addict


Reged: 21/07/2007
Posts: 500
Loc: North East England
Re: Name and shame - Jeremy Wright MP [Re: TimF]
      #680201 - 18/07/2008 09:58

so will AP readers - here

--------------------
Earth, Sky, Sun - www.earthskysun.com

Image Gallery for Forumites if you want to store your pics without ads PM me for details



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Matt_Hunt
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 07/11/2005
Posts: 2232
Re: Name and shame - Peter Ainsworth MP [Re: Ephemeral]
      #680324 - 18/07/2008 13:33

2 emails and no response and not signed when I last check.

Thanks Mr Ainsworth.

--------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/reactivefilm/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
ermintrude
Hinkypuff


Reged: 30/06/2003
Posts: 12166
Loc: London, UK
Re: Name and shame - Peter Ainsworth MP [Re: Matt_Hunt]
      #680334 - 18/07/2008 13:50

Quote:

2 emails and no response and not signed when I last check.

Thanks Mr Ainsworth.




Make an appointment to see him at his surgery. I'd write him a good letter first, pointing out that he hadn't responded to your emails. If he still doesnt respond Id make an appointment to speak to him. Thats (supposed to be) what he's paid for...

--------------------

Further, longer, higher, older...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)

Subscribe now »


CANON 1000D The most affordable EOS yet, but is it a bargain buy?


NIKON D700 Exclusive first look!


TOP TIPS Andy Rouse shares his tips with WDC


MASTERCLASS More




Extra information
1 registered and 6 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, GCW, Siuya, Benchista, Fen, huwevans, Damien Demolder, TheFatControlleR, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 1946

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.204 seconds in which 0.022 seconds were spent on a total of 13 queries. Zlib compression disabled.