Skip to Content
Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Equipment >> Canon Discussions
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
gascanman
newbie


Reged: 13/01/2008
Posts: 36
Is the 70-300 Sigma Enough for the Airshows?
      #672316 - 29/06/2008 15:13

hey all, I am a bit stuck, could do with some advice. I dont wanna spend too much this year on glass, I took some excellent shots last year with the 90-300 usm, but need a new zoom lens for this year.

Been looking arong, is the 70-300 sigma ok for airshows? IQ isnt an issue, more the autofocus speed.

Its on a 40d, so any help would be great.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Gordon_McGeachie
Joke Historian


Reged: 19/01/2007
Posts: 3823
Loc: East Yorkshire,
Re: Is the 70-300 Sigma Enough for the Airshows? [Re: gascanman]
      #672322 - 29/06/2008 16:18

Quote:

hey all, I am a bit stuck, could do with some advice. I dont wanna spend too much this year on glass, I took some excellent shots last year with the 90-300 usm, but need a new zoom lens for this year.

Been looking arong, is the 70-300 sigma ok for airshows? IQ isnt an issue, more the autofocus speed.

Its on a 40d, so any help would be great.




It should be fine considering the crop factor.i used the Sigma 28-300 last year it coped with what I wanted, but now I have a second body, I will also use my prime 400f5.6

--------------------
Old Photographers never die,They just go out of focus.

Jet Noise - The Sound Of Freedom
She Took To The Sky Like A Lovesick Angel.

www.flickr.com/photos/gordon_mcgeachie/

www.flickr.com/people/26089093@N08/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BigAl999
newbie


Reged: 29/12/2007
Posts: 35
Loc: Norfolk
Re: Is the 70-300 Sigma Enough for the Airshows? [Re: Gordon_McGeachie]
      #672353 - 29/06/2008 19:06

Personally I feel that a bit more lenght would be useful. I curently use the Sigma 28-300 and before that the Canon 75-300 USM and really wanted more, I had a cheap 2x converter from Jessops but found uisg it on manual focus with the Canon lens awkward as the front element rotated with the focus ring and was very easy to move as the focus with the 2x on would go well past infinty Autofoucs did work on occasion but was not reliable. With the Sigma I think it would be much easier to use the lens on manual and am thinking about a cheap 1.4x converter if I can find one. About 30 years ago I was using a Vivitar 80-200 with 2x converter on an ME super regularly at airshows and really could have used another 100-150mm did use a 500mm mirror and that was about the right length. I have a 500mm Centon mirror lens wich dose work on my 300D but the contrast is so poor (I think it is flare) that it takes a lot of work in Photoshop to get good results with it.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
gascanman
newbie


Reged: 13/01/2008
Posts: 36
Re: Is the 70-300 Sigma Enough for the Airshows? [Re: BigAl999]
      #673048 - 01/07/2008 11:18

thanks for your help - I had a bit more thinking, and to be honest would have loved to buy the 100-400mm L - I just couldnt do it for one day of the year, so got the 70-300 IS instead. Hopefully the quality will be better than the 90-300 so I can do some crops.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Norman



Reged: 23/09/2004
Posts: 1535
Loc: West London, UK
Re: Is the 70-300 Sigma Enough for the Airshows? [Re: gascanman]
      #673160 - 01/07/2008 16:02

Quote:

thanks for your help - I had a bit more thinking, and to be honest would have loved to buy the 100-400mm L - I just couldnt do it for one day of the year, so got the 70-300 IS instead. Hopefully the quality will be better than the 90-300 so I can do some crops.




Don't just use it on one day a year. RIAT this year may have the Vulcan flying. Worth a visit just for that. 12th/13th July here.

Some pictures from previous RIATs on my photobox site below.

--------------------
Regards,
Norman
www.photobox.org.uk

A woman has the last word in any argument.
Anything a man says after that is the start of a new argument.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
gascanman
newbie


Reged: 13/01/2008
Posts: 36
Re: Is the 70-300 Sigma Enough for the Airshows? [Re: Norman]
      #673223 - 01/07/2008 18:16

Oh YES! - we going on the 12th - For the Vulcan. I got some spectacular shots last year with my 350d and 90-300 lens. Hopefully this will be better!

Cant wait to see the Vulcan if it is finished on time!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Gordon_McGeachie
Joke Historian


Reged: 19/01/2007
Posts: 3823
Loc: East Yorkshire,
Re: Is the 70-300 Sigma Enough for the Airshows? [Re: gascanman]
      #673378 - 01/07/2008 21:47

Quote:

Oh YES! - we going on the 12th - For the Vulcan. I got some spectacular shots last year with my 350d and 90-300 lens. Hopefully this will be better!

Cant wait to see the Vulcan if it is finished on time!




here is a link to the CAA website

http://tinyurl.com/5ngs4g

Keep checking here for news

--------------------
Old Photographers never die,They just go out of focus.

Jet Noise - The Sound Of Freedom
She Took To The Sky Like A Lovesick Angel.

www.flickr.com/photos/gordon_mcgeachie/

www.flickr.com/people/26089093@N08/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1

Subscribe now »


CANON 1000D The most affordable EOS yet, but is it a bargain buy?


NIKON D700 Exclusive first look!


TOP TIPS Andy Rouse shares his tips with WDC


MASTERCLASS More




Extra information
0 registered and 5 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, GCW, Benchista, Siuya, huwevans, Fen, TheFatControlleR, Damien Demolder, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 599

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.103 seconds in which 0.039 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.