Skip to Content
Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Equipment >> Leica Camera Chat
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
Tietje
newbie


Reged: 13/04/2008
Posts: 3
Loc: Dublin
M Mount Summitar
      #642414 - 13/04/2008 12:01

I have just purchased from a very reputable Leica dealer (over the counter) an guaranteed "M Mount F2 Collapsible Summitar". There are no markings ie. the number and type of the lens where they should be, except "Germany" on the lens mount. I've just checked my copy of the Leica Collector's Guide by Denis Laney and it says that the Collapsible Summitar never came in an M mount only a screw mount. So what have I got here a F2 Summicron or a conversion or what I was told in the shop, and the Collector's Guide is wrong.

Thanks for any guidance on this issue


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BrianT
Old Hand


Reged: 16/05/2001
Posts: 5987
Loc: Leeds
Re: M Mount Summitar [Re: Tietje]
      #642417 - 13/04/2008 12:22

Could be interesting.

A few ' funny' Summitars were made in 1950 primarily for testing. They were in fact prototype Summicrons. The lenses can be identified by an asterisk after the name Summitar.

These are very rare and I cannot understand how or why a " reputable" Leica specialist would have been unaware of what he was selling. Or did he in fact charge you a hefty premium?

I have examined one in the past which had indeed been converted to M mount, a very simple job.

Edited by BrianT (13/04/2008 12:23)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tietje
newbie


Reged: 13/04/2008
Posts: 3
Loc: Dublin
Re: M Mount Summitar [Re: BrianT]
      #642424 - 13/04/2008 12:39

Thanks for that information. The price was very reasonable, which what made it so attractive, so like you say its probably not a rarity. In fact as I look underneath the lens mount there is some un-plated brass, so again like you say it is a conversion. I didn't realise that this kind of thing went that much or that it was a simple job.

Thanks once again, you've saved me a trip back to the shop !


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BrianT
Old Hand


Reged: 16/05/2001
Posts: 5987
Loc: Leeds
Re: M Mount Summitar [Re: Tietje]
      #642434 - 13/04/2008 13:12

But it is interesting.

Bye the way if you check the first couple of editions of "The Leica Pocket Book you will find Laney was not the author. It was a certain rogue, Brian Tompkins. Laney took over when yours truly got bored.

Screw to bayonet mounts are simple, even today Voigtlander still make them.

--------------------
Brian BSRIPN

Oh for the days when Elvis was king and everything else was a 50th @ F11.

Edited by BrianT (13/04/2008 13:14)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Heric
newbie


Reged: 31/03/2008
Posts: 12
Loc: Milan, Italy
Re: M Mount Summitar [Re: BrianT]
      #642435 - 13/04/2008 13:18

Hi
No, probably the goal you have bought is fine
Surely it is a variant not registered on the books and manuals
Sometimes the manufacturers enter the market for models (Prototypes)
Where there is no endorsement and caption
Sorry if you do not speak good English ...

--------------------
http://newnonsololeica.blogspot.com/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Tietje
newbie


Reged: 13/04/2008
Posts: 3
Loc: Dublin
Re: M Mount Summitar [Re: Heric]
      #642439 - 13/04/2008 13:43

The other puzzling thing for me is why it would no Leitz markings. Did it never have them or have they been lost somehow ? There is a screw thread where according to the aforementioned collectors guide there is a an engraved black ring.

Thanks once again


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BrianT
Old Hand


Reged: 16/05/2001
Posts: 5987
Loc: Leeds
Re: M Mount Summitar [Re: Tietje]
      #642440 - 13/04/2008 13:50

These lenses were made around 1950, in other words not long after the war. In those days Leitz were very much a family run cottage industry. All sorts of variations occurred, it is a minefield for the student or collector. The two examples I remember both were marked as I said with the * followed by a serial number. In fact if you look in Lager Vol 2 you will find an illustration.

--------------------
Brian BSRIPN

Oh for the days when Elvis was king and everything else was a 50th @ F11.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1

Subscribe now »


CANON 1000D The most affordable EOS yet, but is it a bargain buy?


NIKON D700 Exclusive first look!


TOP TIPS Andy Rouse shares his tips with WDC


MASTERCLASS More




Extra information
0 registered and 8 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, GCW, Siuya, huwevans, Benchista, Fen, TheFatControlleR, Damien Demolder, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 1063

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.158 seconds in which 0.025 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.