Skip to Content
Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Technical Discussions: Photography >> Monochrome Photography
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
BeerBolus
newbie


Reged: 09/03/2006
Posts: 41
Loc: Hertford
Low light 35mm B&W film
      #544705 - 23/09/2007 21:13

Hello
I am off to Argentina in November and would like to shoot some B&W film. I normally shoot digital RAW and convert to B&W later but would like to take both formats with me.
I particularly like available light photography (hand held mostly) at high ISO and would appreciate some advice on what to take.

Delta 3200 Professional obviously has the speed, or I could push HP5 Plus?
Is there a fast slide film that might be an option?

Any advice on quality, how well they scan etc would be very helpful.

Thanks for your time.

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
beejaybee
Marvin


Reged: 18/07/2007
Posts: 4413
Loc: Really Here In Name Only
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: BeerBolus]
      #544713 - 23/09/2007 21:33

Well - I wouldn't recommend pushing HP5+ above 1600 ASA; Delta 3200 can be pushed to 6400 ASA. Both will have pretty horrendous grain if you do.

I hope the light traps in your camera are in good condition.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AJUK



Reged: 22/03/2005
Posts: 2654
Loc: UK
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: beejaybee]
      #544878 - 24/09/2007 10:23

There is also the possibility of pushing XP2, although you will need a lab to develop that.

--------------------
Al

[Insert clever comment here]


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
OneTen
'Two Breakfasts'


Reged: 23/06/2003
Posts: 2446
Loc: Devon
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: AJUK]
      #544917 - 24/09/2007 11:50

I've pushed Neopan 400 to 3200 at a football match and the results were poor, too grainy to use.

I tried Delta 3200 but didn't have much success, I think this was because I was developing it in Rodinol and the negs were incredibly thin. Things improved when developed in DDX but it was never a film I was taken with.

I use Neopan 400 almost exclusively now, though I am dabbling with the C-41 CN version at the moment so I can have them processed on the high street.

--------------------
Richard .......... My Website - My Blog - My Flickr


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Mojo_66
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 25/05/2006
Posts: 3249
Loc: Lancs
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: OneTen]
      #544966 - 24/09/2007 12:50

Ilford 3200 develops well in ID11. Grain's there obviously but it isn't golfball size. If you scan it however this could make the grain more apparent.

--------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mojo_black/


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BenchistaModerator
Wich Tyler


Reged: 11/08/2000
Posts: 36906
Loc: Everywhere and nowhere, baby
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: BeerBolus]
      #545008 - 24/09/2007 13:44

Delta 3200 in Kodak TMax dev always gave me the best results.

--------------------
Nick

www.nbrphoto.com

Light and Shade II - the new blog


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BeerBolus
newbie


Reged: 09/03/2006
Posts: 41
Loc: Hertford
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: Benchista]
      #545070 - 24/09/2007 15:45

Thanks for the replys.

I won't be developing myself (not yet anyway) so will be using a lab (Ideally I want a contact strip and the negs scanned). Have been looking at previous threads about that so hopefully won't have any problems there.

I think I will take a few rolls of each, some NEOPAN 1600 as well and with any luck will come away with a 'favorite'.

Will hopefully be able to post some of the results late this year.

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Garry McNamara
Snr Tutor/Bongo Banjo


Reged: 16/08/2006
Posts: 2074
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: BeerBolus]
      #545949 - 26/09/2007 09:54

Bit lateral I know, but before playing around wih film why not buy a cheaps as chips 50mm f1.4. I don't know what lens you normally use but it lets in one hell of a lot more light than a standard zoom. I don't own any 35mm lens with less than an f2 maximum aperture(except my 24mm and camera shake is not such a worry with that)and I find 400 ISO more than enough,

Garry


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BeerBolus
newbie


Reged: 09/03/2006
Posts: 41
Loc: Hertford
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: Garry McNamara]
      #545966 - 26/09/2007 10:15

Will keep a look out for one. My 50mm f1.8 just died, oil on the aperture blades. Just bought a Carl Zeiss 28mm f2.8 for £23 and am running a roll of HP5 pushed to 1600ASA throught the camera at the moment. As much to check it all works ok (not been used in years) as well as to see the results at 1600.
I often shoot in dark bars, pubs, by street light etc and have found on my 20D that, with a 50mm f1.8, I often shoot at 800-1600 ASA. Mind you, with f1.4 to play with...

Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PeteE
enthusiast


Reged: 23/08/2005
Posts: 395
Loc: BRENTWOOD,Essex
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: BeerBolus]
      #546071 - 26/09/2007 13:32

Mind the PICKPOCKETS and DON'T MENTION the Falkland Islands!

--------------------
Got COMPUTERISED at last and now Digitised but FILM still RULES!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
BeerBolus
newbie


Reged: 09/03/2006
Posts: 41
Loc: Hertford
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: PeteE]
      #546111 - 26/09/2007 14:27

Yes, the "Islas Malvinas" will definately not be a topic of conversation!

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Gordon_McGeachie
Joke Historian


Reged: 19/01/2007
Posts: 3960
Loc: East Yorkshire,
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: AJUK]
      #546688 - 27/09/2007 16:05

Any normal lab should be able to do it.

As it is C41 process.Just tell them that you have uprated it and by how much

--------------------
She (Avro Vulcan XH558)Took To The Sky Like A Lovesick Angel.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
domroberts



Reged: 13/07/2000
Posts: 64
Loc: Kent
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: BeerBolus]
      #547032 - 28/09/2007 10:25

I've always used Neopan 1600 for such things, I like the grain structure on it. Would definitely recommend a roll or two of that.

Oh and can you still buy Kodak TMZ 3200 these days?

--------------------
Dom Roberts


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Neal
member


Reged: 19/06/2006
Posts: 149
Loc: Oxfordshire, UK
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: domroberts]
      #554509 - 15/10/2007 16:39

Tri-X pushed in XTOL....runs at 3200 ISO quite happily and grain isnt super silly either.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DaveS
member


Reged: 22/06/2007
Posts: 196
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: Neal]
      #556241 - 18/10/2007 14:35

Delta 3200 in DD-X, but I tend to PULL it if anything, and rate it at EI 1600. I have read that its true ISO is 1000-1250.
Dave


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
topoxforddoc
newbie


Reged: 27/07/2007
Posts: 33
Re: Low light 35mm B&W film [Re: DaveS]
      #560577 - 27/10/2007 23:46

HP5 or TRI-X push well in XTOL. If you're shooting low light, it sounds as if you need a rangefinder, the ultimate camera for low light shooting. You don't need to buy a Leica, a Voigtlander would do with a 35 lens faster than F2. I regularly shoot night time shots with my leica and 35/1.4 handheld at 1/15th sec on HP5 rated either at 400 or pushed to 800.

Charlie


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1

Subscribe now »


NIKON D700 Prepare to want one!


SUPERZOOM GROUP TEST Four of the latest bridge cameras tested


SCANNING All you need to know about digitising your images


FIELD

More




Extra information
0 registered and 2 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, GCW, huwevans, Siuya, Benchista, Fen, TheFatControlleR, Damien Demolder, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 3270

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.078 seconds in which 0.009 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.