ISO 102,400 anyone?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shaun2k

Yeah i hate midgies......

---

I squashed this one after taking it's pic:D

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1268/...590787cf_o.jpg

Most of the time I just squash 'em though;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by shaun2k

this was on 800:

http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o...40774_9482.jpg

and i'm not seeing much grain there, apart from the slight red advance, so whats the deal with uber iso's

102,400 iso on a k10d if possible would be....lol..

http://i121.photobucket.com/albums/o...urbynight2.jpg

---

I LOLd... :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by daft_biker

I squashed this one after taking it's pic:D

http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1268/...590787cf_o.jpg

Most of the time I just squash 'em though;)

---

i cant believe you even managed to snap it, they are sooooo small..mega macro:D

My return to photography was intended to get me back into shooting news stories where the ability to take low-light pictures is a 'must-have'. However, then reality set in (in terms of cost) and I remembered the advice of one picture desk sub who said, "If you've got a reasonable photograph of the crash as it happened, then who's gonna care about how grainy it is?" So ultra high iso is demoted to 'desireable' until I become a top news pro and can afford it. I guess I'll never know...