Panda_
addict
Reged: 17/06/2008
Posts: 400
Loc: South Wales
|
|
You know you have various sizes like 58mm and 62mm etc. am I able to buy _any_ filter as long as it's compatible with my lens (holds 58mm)
I'd like to buy some new equipment for my camera but due to my experience I've only been searching for stuff that say "compatible with Fuji s9000" 
-P
--------------------
My Flickr account.
|
john_g
Pooh-bah Hoo-ha
Reged: 09/05/2007
Posts: 2540
Loc: Surrey
|
|
Yes. Filters aren't specific to any camera type, you just have to get the thread size right. If you have lenses that take different sized filters, a good idea can be to buy the filters in the largest size you need and then get step-down adaptors that would allow you to fit the bigger filter to a smaller size filter thread e.g. a 58-52 step-down ring would allow you to fit a 58mm filter to a lens designed for 52mm filters. This can save quite a bit of money.
Oh, and if you are going to buy a polariser, make sure it's a "circular" type.
--------------------
John
Who could suppose that angels move the stars, or be so superstitious as to suppose that because one cannot see one's soul at the end of a microscope, it does not exist?
R.D.Laing The Politics Of Experience
http://www.flickr.com/photos/john_gass
|
LargeFormat
veteran
Reged: 24/10/2006
Posts: 1213
Loc: Buckinghamshire and Cumbria
|
|
Good recommendation. Kood do every size of stepping ring and they are inexpensive. With wide angles they will also take the filter bezel outside that of the lens and reduce the possibility of vignetting.
|
Panda_
addict
Reged: 17/06/2008
Posts: 400
Loc: South Wales
|
|
Quote:
Yes. Filters aren't specific to any camera type, you just have to get the thread size right. If you have lenses that take different sized filters, a good idea can be to buy the filters in the largest size you need and then get step-down adaptors that would allow you to fit the bigger filter to a smaller size filter thread e.g. a 58-52 step-down ring would allow you to fit a 58mm filter to a lens designed for 52mm filters. This can save quite a bit of money.
Oh, and if you are going to buy a polariser, make sure it's a "circular" type.
Cheers John,
I've had a look around, pricing a few things up but what I'd like to know is this:
What is the difference between each brand? An example being that I went to Walters (yeah, they can be pricey) and noticed a Hoya/some other brand circular polariser filter for £35 and Argos are selling the same filters for £7.99 for some CamLink one.
Priced up an ND8 filter which was £22 as well, so I guess I'll have to wait until I get more money, since I lost £20 when I was out shooting last night 
--------------------
My Flickr account.
|
alanS
Dr Dust
Reged: 30/09/2005
Posts: 3724
Loc: Up North, England.
|
|
You could have a look at a filter holder system like Cokin.
--------------------
Alan's defence lawyer claimed that "Booze played no part in his typo's."
|
beejaybee
Marvin
Reged: 18/07/2007
Posts: 5268
Loc: Really Here In Name Only
|
|
Quote:
What is the difference between each brand? An example being that I went to Walters (yeah, they can be pricey) and noticed a Hoya/some other brand circular polariser filter for £35 and Argos are selling the same filters for £7.99 for some CamLink one.
I very much doubt they're the same filter... may be labelled similarly, but Hoya filters are usually quite good (at £35 you should be getting decent anti-reflective coatings for a start), cheapo ones are likely to have poor coatings (if any) and all the optical excellence of a beer bottle bottom.
Cheap filters usually work spectacularly badly with telephoto lenses in particular. But the more expensive ones often have a thinner mount too, which means less danger of vignetting with wide angle lenses.
You tend to get what you pay for; spending hundreds of pounds on a decent lens then skimping on a filter is daft.
|
Panda_
addict
Reged: 17/06/2008
Posts: 400
Loc: South Wales
|
|
Quote:
You tend to get what you pay for; spending hundreds of pounds on a decent lens then skimping on a filter is daft.
I've noticed that you get what you pay for in Photography.
It seems when it comes to buying a lens that you see for example, a Canon lens for £700 then a cheaper model of the same spec for £300, there would be a £400 difference somewhere.
Last question here then for me:
Is there much (if any at all!) a difference between circular PL filters and 'normal' ones?
--------------------
My Flickr account.
|
Fen
BAD WOLF
Reged: 12/03/2002
Posts: 21356
Loc: London'ish
|
|
If it's for a camera with autofocus you have to use a circular PL.
A linear PL is of no use to you.
--------------------
Fen .......... My Galleries - My Blog - My Flickr
|
LargeFormat
veteran
Reged: 24/10/2006
Posts: 1213
Loc: Buckinghamshire and Cumbria
|
|
Quote:
What is the difference between each brand?
Hoya do two (as far as I know) grades. The superior one is called Pro. It has (allegedly) better coatings and a narrower bezel which is particularly significant on the polarizing filter to avoid vignetting.
|
AlexMonro
old hand
Reged: 05/06/2006
Posts: 778
Loc: Exeter, Devon (and Somerset so...
|
|
Quote:
You know you have various sizes like 58mm and 62mm etc. am I able to buy _any_ filter as long as it's compatible with my lens (holds 58mm)
I'd like to buy some new equipment for my camera but due to my experience I've only been searching for stuff that say "compatible with Fuji s9000"
-P
The Fuji S9000 is quite compatible with industry standards for many accessories - I have one (under the UK name of S9500).
The filter thread size is 58mm, it has a standard flash hotshoe and PC sync socket, which are compatible with many flashguns (though you need to be careful of the trigger voltage with some very old types), and it has a standard shutter release button thread for a simple mechanical cable release.
The filters I use are a Hoya 58mm circular polariser, and a Cokin A series kit with neutral density and ND grad filters (in retrospect, I wish I'd gone for the slightly larger Cokin P series, which would be more compatible with other cameras and lenses I've aquired since the S9500).
|
Zou
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 05/02/2007
Posts: 2154
Loc: Edinburgh
|
|
There's a wee guide to polarisers in this month's WDC magazine. Well worth a look.
--------------------
Zou's Flickr Page
|
Rhys
Sasquatch
Reged: 15/01/2004
Posts: 3372
Loc: York (home of the speedbump)
|
|
Quote:
If it's for a camera with autofocus you have to use a circular PL.
A linear PL is of no use to you.
Funny thing that, I have a linear Cokin PL and never had any problems with it on autofocus cameras.
--------------------
NRIPN (Officially Nuts..)
RGMP.co.uk (My Website.. getting there at last.)
Benchinistas.org.uk The home of Benchism
|
El Sid
Going potty
Reged: 14/04/2003
Posts: 9541
Loc: Sussex-by-the-Sea
|
|
Me neither............... in fact the only polariser that has given me focus problems - on both AF and manual cameras - is a circular type.... 
--------------------
Nigel
Completely BSRIPN 
ElSid Gallery
A camera in the hand is more fun than one in the cupboard........
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
