Skip to Content
Digital Photography Forum - A shared resource

Technical Discussions: Photography >> Colour Photography
 |  Print Topic
Jump to first unread post. Pages: 1
BeerBelly
newbie


Reged: 03/04/2008
Posts: 14
Loc: South East, UK
Depth of Field Question - Newbie
      #670533 - 24/06/2008 15:18

Hi, only just starting to understand all the components that make up an exposure.

Real quick DOF question.

Trying to be clever and shot a matchbox car close to make it as big as a real car in the background. Obviously I can focus on background or foreground - is there a way I can trick the focus to a happy medium so the toy car looks the same size as the real car and make them both a similar focus? Do I have to focus in on something that is in between the toy car and real car to achieve this - haven;t got a clue!

Its for a fun work contest and apart from cropping no editing is allowed. Using a Canon 450D and pretty much shooting in auto mode until I've read some more books and experimented (only had a few weeks). Any help or tips would be appreciated! Can upload some efforts if you need to see what I mean?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
beejaybee
Marvin


Reged: 18/07/2007
Posts: 4850
Loc: Really Here In Name Only
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: BeerBelly]
      #670595 - 24/06/2008 17:47

Quote:

Trying to be clever and shot a matchbox car close to make it as big as a real car in the background. Obviously I can focus on background or foreground - is there a way I can trick the focus to a happy medium so the toy car looks the same size as the real car and make them both a similar focus? Do I have to focus in on something that is in between the toy car and real car to achieve this



I think you'll struggle with anything other than a phone cam, unless you use a pinhole "lens" (which doesn't need focusing at all).

Focus on something twice as far away as the closest point you want in focus in order to get the optimum DoF.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LargeFormat
old hand


Reged: 24/10/2006
Posts: 1154
Loc: Buckinghamshire and Cumbria
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: BeerBelly]
      #670789 - 25/06/2008 09:07

That's one of the reasons people use large frame cameras with tilt lens and back. You can achieve focus at different distances across the picture so, say, the bottom of the frame can be in focus on something close and the top on infinity. If large format is going a bit too far Canon and Nikon make tilt/shift lenses for their cameras and Hartblie (using Carl Zeiss optics) make them for a number of mounts.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
alanS
Dr Dust


Reged: 30/09/2005
Posts: 3633
Loc: Up North, England.
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: BeerBelly]
      #671343 - 26/06/2008 15:11

How about as wide a lens as possible with a small aperture, hyperfocal style. The DOF should be quite deep.

--------------------
Alan's defence lawyer claimed that "Booze played no part in his typo's."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Per
old hand


Reged: 28/11/2005
Posts: 715
Loc: UK Berkshire
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: alanS]
      #671355 - 26/06/2008 15:44

Or borrow a TSE 24 lens and use shift to swing the focal plane into a focal wedge (and stop down to f/22), a bit like the aforementioned large format camera.

Actually, I have one of these lenses so I'll try it out - sounds fun!

--------------------
There are two things to aim at in life: first, to get what you want; and after
that, to enjoy it. Only the wisest of mankind achieve the second.
Logan Pearsall Smith (1865-1946)


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
El Sid
Going potty


Reged: 14/04/2003
Posts: 9437
Loc: Sussex-by-the-Sea
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: BeerBelly]
      #671356 - 26/06/2008 15:49

If you have a Cokin filter mount you could try one of the Cokin Split Close-Up filters (Ref Nos. 111-113, scroll down page)...

--------------------
Nigel

Completely BSRIPN

ElSid Gallery

A camera in the hand is better than one in the cupboard........


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
AlexMonro
old hand


Reged: 05/06/2006
Posts: 740
Loc: Exeter, Devon (and Somerset so...
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: Per]
      #671392 - 26/06/2008 17:11

Quote:

Or borrow a TSE 24 lens and use shift to swing the focal plane into a focal wedge (and stop down to f/22), a bit like the aforementioned large format camera.

Actually, I have one of these lenses so I'll try it out - sounds fun!




I think that's tilt you use to swing the focal plane - it's still a plane, but no longer parrallel to the film / sensor plane, though I guess it makes the DoF "sharp" zone into a wedge.

Something I'd like to play with sometime - when I can afford a TSE or a large format camera with movements - or maybe a Hartblei?

Can I say "Shiempflug Rule"? And more to the point, can I spell it?


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LargeFormat
old hand


Reged: 24/10/2006
Posts: 1154
Loc: Buckinghamshire and Cumbria
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: El Sid]
      #671512 - 26/06/2008 21:20

Quote:

If you have a Cokin filter mount you could try one of the Cokin Split Close-Up filters (Ref Nos. 111-113, scroll down page)...



Good idea, I'd forgotten about them. You can also get circular screw in versions bit like polarising filters.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Garry McNamara
Snr Tutor/Bongo Banjo


Reged: 16/08/2006
Posts: 2079
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: BeerBelly]
      #674979 - 05/07/2008 14:22

You could try taking several pictures at different focus settings and combining them in a program like Helicon Focus which combines the sharpest element from several pictures - the more the merrier.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Zou
Pooh-Bah


Reged: 05/02/2007
Posts: 2105
Loc: Edinburgh
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: Garry McNamara]
      #675728 - 07/07/2008 17:01

Quote:

You could try taking several pictures at different focus settings and combining them in a program like Helicon Focus which combines the sharpest element from several pictures - the more the merrier.






Am I the only person who sees that and thinks - why bother? 1st shot is at f8 - hardly pushing the boat out - and the second shot isn't exactly a resounding victory - still got bits out of focus.

A really low-tech alternative would be to shoot from a greater distance with a smaller aperture (making sure the whole scene is sharp) and crop to the scene intended...

--------------------
Zou's Flickr Page


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Garry McNamara
Snr Tutor/Bongo Banjo


Reged: 16/08/2006
Posts: 2079
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: Zou]
      #675871 - 07/07/2008 21:24

Your right, it is a subtle difference and personally I don't like the look of the sharp areas. Of course since the requirements of the brief say no editing it couldn't be used anyway. There are times when it can be used effectively but they are few and far between - at extreme close up it turns your camera into a kind of scanning microscope.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
daft_bikerModerator
Action Man!


Reged: 11/10/2006
Posts: 7540
Loc: Doon the glen
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: Garry McNamara]
      #676727 - 09/07/2008 14:09

Quote:

You could try taking several pictures at different focus settings and combining them in a program like Helicon Focus which combines the sharpest element from several pictures - the more the merrier.




Thanks Garry, haven't tried that program. Will give it a go and see if it's any better than CombineZM (since I'm too lazy to do stacking properly in photoshop....but then that would be editing ).

--------------------
Andrew (BSRIPN) ... Pics.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Baz94
addict


Reged: 22/05/2007
Posts: 652
Loc: England
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: daft_biker]
      #679026 - 15/07/2008 17:22

Personally, I would se the camera in place and have the focus on the small car and then CLICK, then without moving a fraction, focus on the 2nd car and then click then use elements 4 (Thats what I have) to merge them together or whatever pragram has a cloning tool :-)

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Monobod
'Phantom' of the forum!


Reged: 03/04/2003
Posts: 5939
Loc: Just West of Norwich, Norfolk
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: Baz94]
      #682394 - 24/07/2008 00:01

Try this website:

HERE

--------------------
David.
-----------------------------------------------
Photos hosted by Flickr.
www.flickr.com/photos/monobod/
-----------------------------------------------
I see the world thro' a viewfinder, but the world watches me via CCTV!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
starside
newbie


Reged: 25/07/2005
Posts: 24
Re: Depth of Field Question - Newbie [Re: El Sid]
      #686617 - 04/08/2008 18:19

Quote:

If you have a Cokin filter mount you could try one of the Cokin Split Close-Up filters (Ref Nos. 111-113, scroll down page)...




using a split field focus filter is the only way of doing it.

see here fo use of this filter: http://www.shutterbug.com/features/0302sb_split/index.html


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1

Subscribe now »


CANON EOS 50D Better than the D300?

SONY A900 Sony's full-frame DSLR arrives at last, but has it been worth it?

102 XMAS IDEAS UNDER £100 Beat the credit crunch with our guide

N

More




Extra information
0 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  admin, GCW, Fen, huwevans, Siuya, Benchista, TheFatControlleR, Damien Demolder, AndrewC, mark_jacobs, daft_biker, Myk.R 


Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      Mark-up is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 3433

Rate this topic

Jump to

Contact Us | Privacy statement Main website

Generated in 0.063 seconds in which 0.008 seconds were spent on a total of 12 queries. Zlib compression disabled.