Panasonic Lumix G3 review
Movie Mode
Panasonic Lumix G3 review - Movie Mode
Panasonic G3 review: Movie/Video Quality
The Lumix G3 offers a 1080i movie mode, with a 50 fields per second capture and output at 25 frames per second (The US version is 1080i60 output at 30fps to correlate to the 60Hz NTSC standard). The interlaced capture format means that the even lines are captured on one sensor pass, followed by the odd lines on the next pass. In essence half the image is captured with each pass.
The G3's sister model, the Lumix G2, offers a 720p movie mode. Here the ‘p' designates progressive capture, i.e. that the full frame is captured in a single pass. Now, although the resolution is lower, progressive capture offers a particular benefit: reduced ‘tearing'.
To explain: Tearing can occur when fast moving subjects (or fast panning of camera) are captured in an interlaced format. As the sensor ‘sees' subjects in two slightly moved locations with each interlaced pass (as the G3 suffers) it's possible that the even lines may show the subject in a location that's a few pixels different to the odd set of lines. As such, a 1080i image is inferior to a 720p capture overall and the G3 has no in-camera options to tweak resolution options to a 720p capture (only QVGA and VGA).
Theory put to one side of the moment, however, and the G3's movie captures do look good. A high data rate (75Mbit/sec was sustained in our tests) means there's plenty of detail on display and results are fluid in playback. True movie buffs ought to look toward the Lumix GH2 for the ultimate level of control.
Panasonic G3 review: Movie/Video Record Time
As per all European stills camera release, the G3 is only capable of capturing up to 29mins and 59secs or up to 2GB of recorded footage in a single take. At the full 1080i resolution this will max out far earlier however, as data (in Super High (SH) quality) equates to around 10MB/sec.
Panasonic G3 review: Movie/Video Focusing Modes
Movie focusing is dealt with very smoothly indeed, comprising of single (AF-S), full time (AF-C) or manual focusing options. The full-time focus is far slower and smoother than the rapid pace offered when shooting stills, but this means it's also far more considered for movie shooting. Unlike many other Compact System Cameras and DSLRs, the G3's movie focusing tends to glide into focus without missing the mark. This isn't always the case for more difficult subjects, but it manifests positively in the final recording and looks all the more professional.
During capture it's possible to flick easily between the autofocus mode, i.e. Subject Tracking, Face Priority and the like, without causing a break in capture.
Using a literal hands-on approach with the touchscreen is also one of its best uses, as the subtle focus transitions and subject targeting work very elegantly indeed.
Panasonic G3 review: Movie/Video Manual Control
Here's where Panasonic has held back a little. Fully aware that its champion model, the GH2, is the pinnacle for movie capture, the G3 doesn't offer much in the way of manual movie controls.
Options such as Photo Style and i.Dynamic can be set up before hand, and the same applies to metering and exposure compensation - though, oddly, the latter can't be adjusted during capture.
Panasonic G3 review: Movie/Video Sound
In a similar vein to the limitations with manual control, the G3's sound options are equally prescribed. By relying on its on-board stereo microphone the G3 captures high quality (16-bit, 48,000kHz) sound using Dolby Digital Creator, but fails to offer external microphone support for a more professional solution.





Have your say!
Latest comments
July 14 14:46
Peter Bower
I bought a G3 body as I had the older 14-45 lens [Which this magazine gave a gold award and 93% editors choice] So on that basis with this combination, image quality for the G3 should be at least 19. Its a very good camera, but if you tweak a few settings such as noise filter and sharpening to minus, then tweak it back in post processing the level of detail becomes out standing and thats just Jpegs.There seems to be a paranoia amongst reviewers about noise. Well a little noise even at low ISO is good because it enhances image detail. Read Wrotniac.net, the best Olympus site there is. No, the G3 does not approach a DSLR for image quality, it surpasses 'some' of them. Peter
September 03 17:59
DC
"No, the G3 does not approach a DSLR for image quality, it surpasses 'some' of them." Quite so. A stunning small camera that really improves on the GF1 beats my Sony A55. At the lower price it's a bargain
November 22 20:52
Krasitsky
G3 with good lens will beat near all entry-level DSLR cameras. And it's image quality better than awarded Sony Nex-5N
May 05 09:40
Speiro
I have owned my G3 for about three months and have juat given it the full holiday test. Having switched froman excellent Canon 450d and 4 lenses the weight saving is nothing short of dramatic. I unloaded the 14-42mm kit lense from the start and bought the 14-45mm off ebay. I then added the 45-200mm to give me a 35mm equivalent range of 28-400mm. Everything fits into a tiny bag and it was weightless compared with my old kit which was burdensome after a few miles of walking. So, downsizing was the main motivation and it was worth it for me. Quality-wise, I see little real difference in the results compared with my old Canon. The ability to shoot HD movies with the push of a button proved to be a big plus and the results are amazingly good. However, if movies are your think I would recommend the PZ lenses as manualy zooming does cause some jerkiness as the zoom controls are not smooth enough to go unnoticed. The viewfinder is excellent, huge and 100% accurate. The LCD screen can be positioned at any angle and I am left wondering why there is still a market for micro-twothirds cameras without a built-in VF. The touch screen is easy to use once you get the hang of it. Downsides? Battery life is appalling and it was necessary to buy a back up battery (not the Panny brand--overpriced). I found 4 or 5 short 15 seond movie clips and 25 stills knocked the battery down one notch which means you are two-thirds used up. This was alsmost a deal-breaker for me but the camera's overall quality, huge weight saving and nice quality Panasonic lenses all at moderate cost persuaded me to buy. I would never go back to a APS SLR due to sheer bulk and although I only saw one other user with a Micro-2/3rds camera on my holiday (loads of people with entry level Canons and Nikons) I belive it is the future--especially as many people like the weight and bulk savig which is a big issue given the severe weight and space restrictions on airlines these days. Hope to see an updated kit lens with better macro and maybe a slightly better range.