Panasonic Lumix G3 review
Performance
Panasonic Lumix G3 review - Performance
Set the Lumix G3 to work and it's an impressive beast. Back when Micro Four Thirds was introduced in 2008 via the original Lumix G1 it was undoubtedly a great concept. A concept that, with subsequent releases and multiple manufacturers also releasing individual Compact System Camera products, has really hotted up competitively and gone from strength to strength. Sit the original G1 side-by-side with the latest G3 and they not only look like completely different cameras, the step-up in performance is quite staggering too.
It's autofocus where true breakthroughs can been seen - the ‘light speed' autofocus from the Lumix GH2 was the fastest contrast-detection system we've ever used and, hats off to Panasonic, this same system has been ported into the G3 too. In our tests, which included testing against a GH2, we found there to be no difference in terms of speed. The 0.1s response time feels almost instant and is highly accurate, subject permitting. The only shortcoming of the system, as per any contrast-detection system, is with limited contrast subjects. Block areas of white or black for example with no contrasting edge in the focus area are the most likely to kick up a problem that will cause the camera to fail to attain focus.
Not only has the G3's focusing speed been improved, there's also been development in the focusing types as well. While the same Face Detection, AF-Tracking, 23-Area and 1-Area options are available as per other G-series releases, a new ‘Pinpoint' AF mode now also graces the camera. Defined by a small cross that can be dragged anywhere on the screen (or moved using the d-pad cursors) the allocated area zooms in to 100% magnification to affirm focus is made before the shot can be fired off.
But that's not all: While all the focus modes' of old had limited reach and were 'bordered-off', i.e. not all areas of the screen could attain focus, the G3 now offers edge-to-edge focusing. This means if you choose to drag the focus point to the very top left corner using a finger then it's possible, and with the very same fast AF speed, to compose more creative and obscure shots than before. This is a great step forward that's been lacking from the G-series until now.
It's also with the touch sensitivity that the autofocus system can be adjusted and utilised differently. Although you don't have to assign the G3's focus point by dragging a finger on the screen, it truly is a super-fast way to set up a shot or to press on a moving subject to assign Subject Tracking AF.
A high speed burst mode of 4fps can capture up to seven frames before a pause, though a brief wait and the camera is available to use again. A ‘super high speed' 20fps burst rate is also available - though this uses an electronic shutter and can only capture 4MP-sized images under greater compression.
As well as full manual control the latest intelligent Auto+ (iA+) adds easy on-screen sliders to select between Defocus Control, Brightness (exposure compensation) and Red/Blue colour cast (only these two colours, however). As per the original iA mode, iA+ also recognises the scene at hand and adjusts all settings accordingly for an optimum exposure.
However, using the G3 for an ongoing period of time and it does become rather hot in the hand. Not to the point of concern, but the outer shell does feel warm to the touch.







Have your say!
Latest comments
July 14 14:46
Peter Bower
I bought a G3 body as I had the older 14-45 lens [Which this magazine gave a gold award and 93% editors choice] So on that basis with this combination, image quality for the G3 should be at least 19. Its a very good camera, but if you tweak a few settings such as noise filter and sharpening to minus, then tweak it back in post processing the level of detail becomes out standing and thats just Jpegs.There seems to be a paranoia amongst reviewers about noise. Well a little noise even at low ISO is good because it enhances image detail. Read Wrotniac.net, the best Olympus site there is. No, the G3 does not approach a DSLR for image quality, it surpasses 'some' of them. Peter
September 03 17:59
DC
"No, the G3 does not approach a DSLR for image quality, it surpasses 'some' of them." Quite so. A stunning small camera that really improves on the GF1 beats my Sony A55. At the lower price it's a bargain
November 22 20:52
Krasitsky
G3 with good lens will beat near all entry-level DSLR cameras. And it's image quality better than awarded Sony Nex-5N
May 05 09:40
Speiro
I have owned my G3 for about three months and have juat given it the full holiday test. Having switched froman excellent Canon 450d and 4 lenses the weight saving is nothing short of dramatic. I unloaded the 14-42mm kit lense from the start and bought the 14-45mm off ebay. I then added the 45-200mm to give me a 35mm equivalent range of 28-400mm. Everything fits into a tiny bag and it was weightless compared with my old kit which was burdensome after a few miles of walking. So, downsizing was the main motivation and it was worth it for me. Quality-wise, I see little real difference in the results compared with my old Canon. The ability to shoot HD movies with the push of a button proved to be a big plus and the results are amazingly good. However, if movies are your think I would recommend the PZ lenses as manualy zooming does cause some jerkiness as the zoom controls are not smooth enough to go unnoticed. The viewfinder is excellent, huge and 100% accurate. The LCD screen can be positioned at any angle and I am left wondering why there is still a market for micro-twothirds cameras without a built-in VF. The touch screen is easy to use once you get the hang of it. Downsides? Battery life is appalling and it was necessary to buy a back up battery (not the Panny brand--overpriced). I found 4 or 5 short 15 seond movie clips and 25 stills knocked the battery down one notch which means you are two-thirds used up. This was alsmost a deal-breaker for me but the camera's overall quality, huge weight saving and nice quality Panasonic lenses all at moderate cost persuaded me to buy. I would never go back to a APS SLR due to sheer bulk and although I only saw one other user with a Micro-2/3rds camera on my holiday (loads of people with entry level Canons and Nikons) I belive it is the future--especially as many people like the weight and bulk savig which is a big issue given the severe weight and space restrictions on airlines these days. Hope to see an updated kit lens with better macro and maybe a slightly better range.