Panasonic Lumix G3 review
Design
Panasonic Lumix G3 - Design
The Panasonic Lumix G3 can boast being the smallest and lightest Compact System Camera to include a built-in viewfinder. Shaving some 25% away from the previous G2 is no small feat, but this latest design doesn't suffer from becoming unnecessarily small. It still feels right in the hand and the grip is prominent enough for comfortable holding. Underneath its exterior is an aluminium frame that proves both tough and light, removing some 10% weight when compared to the Lumix G2.
However, with smaller size can come the odd penalty: In this instance it's a downgrade on the battery front. A new battery was obviously necessary in order to fit the slimmer design, but its lower capacity now assumes 270 shots per charge - significantly fewer than the G2's quoted 360 shots per charge. Throw in movie capture too and the battery will be quickly used up by avid snappers.
Secondly the smaller surface area means less hands-on controls. The drive mode and AF switches from the top of the G2 and the entirety of the AF Area mode dial have been lost in the transition to the G3's latest design. It feels rathermore like a Lumix GF2 with a built-in electronic viewfinder in many respects.
Other small changes help to promote more ‘lifestyle'-orientated brand thinking: Panasonic has done away with its numbering system on the front of the camera, instead opting for a simple ‘G' embelishment that shows to the front right-hand side. This is likely to be a mainstay for all future G-series models.
The Lumix G3 is also the first G-series model available in white (in the UK). This will join the more standard black finish, as well as a red option (other colours (chocolate confirmed but others to be confirmed) will be available throughout the globe, depending on various markets) and seems like a sensible choice of colour options in an ever-demanding consumer market - if a white iPhone is good enough for Apple then it looks like Panasonic could well be on the right path here.
In terms of layout the Panasonic G3 features a mode dial on top for quick access of main shooting modes, a d-pad to the rear with a display button (Fn1) above and Q.Menu button (Fn2) below. As well as a one-touch movie button there's also a single-press iA button atop the camera to jump into the new intelligent Auto+ (iA+) mode. A rear thumbwheel doubles up as a button for main control adjustment of aperture, shutter and exposure compensation depending on selected mode. The thumbwheel feels a little taught and is rather small in rotation, meaning spinning through options can be slowed. A softer finish and slightly larger wheel would have been preferable.
The touchscreen element can override the need to use any buttons, and there's even a touch-shutter option to focus and fire off a shot by simply pressing the desired area on the screen itself. The main issue with the touch panel, however, is its sensitivity. In a world where smartphones and tablets are coming ever-more to the fore, the type of ultra-sensitive platforms we're used to isn't upheld by the Lumix G3. A couple of taps and firmer presses here and there will certainly be required by comparison. Also the speed in which display screens pop up can have an ever so slight delay. Yet the touch element does introduce some great quirks: the quick menu is now user-definable as it's possible to click and drag options in and out of its display. Clever stuff.




Have your say!
Latest comments
July 14 14:46
Peter Bower
I bought a G3 body as I had the older 14-45 lens [Which this magazine gave a gold award and 93% editors choice] So on that basis with this combination, image quality for the G3 should be at least 19. Its a very good camera, but if you tweak a few settings such as noise filter and sharpening to minus, then tweak it back in post processing the level of detail becomes out standing and thats just Jpegs.There seems to be a paranoia amongst reviewers about noise. Well a little noise even at low ISO is good because it enhances image detail. Read Wrotniac.net, the best Olympus site there is. No, the G3 does not approach a DSLR for image quality, it surpasses 'some' of them. Peter
September 03 17:59
DC
"No, the G3 does not approach a DSLR for image quality, it surpasses 'some' of them." Quite so. A stunning small camera that really improves on the GF1 beats my Sony A55. At the lower price it's a bargain
November 22 20:52
Krasitsky
G3 with good lens will beat near all entry-level DSLR cameras. And it's image quality better than awarded Sony Nex-5N
May 05 09:40
Speiro
I have owned my G3 for about three months and have juat given it the full holiday test. Having switched froman excellent Canon 450d and 4 lenses the weight saving is nothing short of dramatic. I unloaded the 14-42mm kit lense from the start and bought the 14-45mm off ebay. I then added the 45-200mm to give me a 35mm equivalent range of 28-400mm. Everything fits into a tiny bag and it was weightless compared with my old kit which was burdensome after a few miles of walking. So, downsizing was the main motivation and it was worth it for me. Quality-wise, I see little real difference in the results compared with my old Canon. The ability to shoot HD movies with the push of a button proved to be a big plus and the results are amazingly good. However, if movies are your think I would recommend the PZ lenses as manualy zooming does cause some jerkiness as the zoom controls are not smooth enough to go unnoticed. The viewfinder is excellent, huge and 100% accurate. The LCD screen can be positioned at any angle and I am left wondering why there is still a market for micro-twothirds cameras without a built-in VF. The touch screen is easy to use once you get the hang of it. Downsides? Battery life is appalling and it was necessary to buy a back up battery (not the Panny brand--overpriced). I found 4 or 5 short 15 seond movie clips and 25 stills knocked the battery down one notch which means you are two-thirds used up. This was alsmost a deal-breaker for me but the camera's overall quality, huge weight saving and nice quality Panasonic lenses all at moderate cost persuaded me to buy. I would never go back to a APS SLR due to sheer bulk and although I only saw one other user with a Micro-2/3rds camera on my holiday (loads of people with entry level Canons and Nikons) I belive it is the future--especially as many people like the weight and bulk savig which is a big issue given the severe weight and space restrictions on airlines these days. Hope to see an updated kit lens with better macro and maybe a slightly better range.