Canon EOS 5D Mark II review
Review Date : Sat, 20 Dec 2008
Author : Matt Golowczynski
Canon's new 21 megapixel full frame digital SLR offers the same resolution as its EOS 1Ds Mk.III but for less than half the price. With the Nikon D700 and Sony Alpha a900 snapping at its heels what does the 5D Mark II have to say for itself?
| Pros: | Excellent image quality, good noise control, colour rendition, great LCD screen, usable video |
|---|---|
| Cons: | ISO 25,600 unusable, banding at high ISO's, chromatic aberrations fail to be removed, users may have preferred faster burst rate and/or more advanced focusing system to the inclusion of video mode |
Whoever coined the phrase about patience being a virtue would probably have a lot to say about Canon’s EOS 5D Mark II, or more specifically on the wild speculation that preceded its launch. It’s been over three years since Canon’s EOS 5D was announced, which gave ample time for all manner of conjecture. The superb Photoshop skills of a few perhaps demonstrated this to its extreme, with entirely convincing images of 7D’s, 6D’s and even 3D’s circulating internet forums for months on end, accompanied by specification lists and possible release dates – if anyone from Canon was watching, it must have been an absolute spectacle to take in.
This unprecedented level of interest wasn't without justification. The 5D’s conception and following success marked it as a landmark model – not just for Canon but for the DSLR itself. Thanks to the physical and financial advantage it brought to the user, it became the darling of wedding, landscape and portraiture circles, as well as the oft-mentioned photojournalism genre, and helped pave the way for the future of the full frame.
So why the long wait for its successor? Years came and went with no solid word from the company, and when Canon did comment it said that the 5D’s performance was still something to be matched, and so a replacement wasn’t a priority. True, its popularity even today does nothing but confirm this, but its specifications had begun to show their age and so people rightly began to suspect that a replacement would soon arrive.
And arrive it has, this time with HD video recording at the helm, along with a new processor, 21MP sensor, and with the slightly less ambitious 5D Mark II moniker. Given the relatively long time gap between its release and that of the model it replaces, the 5D Mark II is a considerable upgrade, yet, unlike its predecessor, it’s now not the only contender in its field. So, three years on, and with Nikon and Sony watching closely, exactly what relevance does the EOS 5D Mark II have?
Next page: Canon EOS 5D Mark II features
More Canon EOS 5D on What Digital Camera.com
- Compare the Canon EOS 5D Mark II with other products
- Canon EOS 5D Mark II sample images
- Canon EOS 5D Mark II product photos
Verdict
Traditionally, Canon and Nikon's approach to the pro market was to have one model built for speed and one for cold, hard resolution, though the advent of highly-specified offshoots at a cheaper price point means that this concept isn't as defined as it used to be. Canon users may now have the resolution of the 1Ds Mark III in a smaller and much cheaper body, but it's clear that the similarities end there. Rather than being a straightforward derivative of its pro sibling, the 5D Mark II has its predecessor as its template, but with its 50D sibling as a strong influence. As such, the newer model may not be expected to perform to the same 'pro' standard as the 1Ds Mark III, and its specifications, to a degree, reflect this. For speed, responsiveness and high-sensitivity shooting (and at the moment, price, too), it's clear that Nikon's D700 still maintains a comfortable lead, and it's no surprise that many pros have defected that way. However, much as comparisons are drawn between the two, it's perhaps more sensible to look towards Sony's A900 as a direct competitor, whose spec sheet and price more closely resemble that of the 5D Mark II. Both these models are suited to their applications almost equally, though Canon's extensive support system is something that will no doubt swing the ball very much in Canon's favour - particularly for the professional. On the issue of movie recording I remain enthusiastic, and I completely side with Canon on having included it in the 5D Mark II. After all, the 5D Mark II isn't designed necessarily for the average person with £2000 burning a hole in their pocket, but for the professional who is likely to call upon it as required. A photojournalist or wedding photographer with the ability to record video - even if compromised by a number of limitations - is without question a much greater asset than one who cannot. Purists will argue otherwise but no-one's under any obligation to use it, and its future development could potentially lead to benefits outside of its use, such as with advances in sensor cooling. Perhaps critically, we not only get the best EOS image quality yet, but at less than half the price of the existing 1Ds Mark III. Nikon and Sony are hardly taking this lying down, but they certainly have a fight on their hands, because in our estimation the EOS 5D Mark II is, all things considered, probably the best ever Canon DSLR.





Have your say!
Latest comments
January 21 10:10
Bill Green
Good review, valuable information. Helped with my decision on a new camera.
January 21 10:13
Gemma Webb
Great review goes into a lot of detail. I managed to find everything I needed from one source so I'll definitely be returning to this site in the future.
February 01 06:36
Grosse Fatigue
Your score is a shame and once again an indication of the bias of this magazine toward Nikon. I would rate this camera 9.5. Shame on you.
March 13 14:33
dalekman
How can a score of 92% be 'a shame' Grosse, it seems like a pretty good review to me. You sound like a sad obsessed Canon sycophant.