Sony Alpha a230 review
Value & Image Quality
Sony Alpha A230 review - Value for Money
At the budget entry point to the DSLR range it would be foolish to avoid the issue of price.
The previous Sony Alpha A200 was, for a long time, one of the cheapest DSLRs on the market; the A230 (with lens) is currently placed at least £35 cheaper than the Canon 1000D (£390 with lens) and the Nikon D3000 (£450 with lens) entry-level models, making it also highly competitive on price. Against this competition it holds up well and there is nothing it is really missing.
Prices are likely to fluctuate as the camera ages and new ones are added, so bear in mind that should you find the Sony A230 for a cheaper price than the £355 street price at time of testing, you are getting a better deal. Right now though, this is a decent proposition but one with very able competition.
Sony Alpha A230 image quality
Sony A230 Tone and Exposure
The metering system is very proficient in gaining a balanced tonal range and this is clearly seen from the image histograms. Presented with high-contrast scenes, in which it is unable to capture the full range, the metering will slightly underexpose to maintain the greatest amount of tone. By using the D-range optimiser it is also possible to capture more detail in highlight and shadow areas, because the camera will automatically adjust the brightness and contrast of the shot.
Sony A230 White Balance and Colour
For an entry-level model the range of white balance settings on this camera is extensive. Each of the presets has manual adjustments, and there's also a custom setting. If you leave it set to Auto it performs adequately, though there is a slightly worrying tendency to produce slightly cold results in shady scenes, and even portraits, when using one of the exposure modes from the PASM quartet.
Sony A230 Raw/JPEG
A maximum value of ISO 3200 may not seem like much of a feat these days, but to actually deliver usable results above the ISO 1600 mark is still a rare ability. With all noise-reduction technology turned off there are obvious signs of noise on the A230 at the higher values, with coloured noise creeping into shadow areas and a diminished level of detail. However, the overall image is still pleasing to the naked eye and comparatively impressive for such an ISO value.
Sony A230 Noise and ISO
There is very little visual difference between the Raw and JPEG files straight from the camera, even viewed as an enlargement of a 300 x 300-pixel section. On close examination the JPEG file shows greater fringing but slightly sharper edges thanks to sharpening but the Raw appears slightly brighter - in most cases making this difficult to see. The adjusted Raw file presents a better final result, however, thanks to the non-destructive editing.
Sony A230 Sharpness and Detail
The main limiting factor appears to be in the resolution, with detail surviving down to the pixel. However, there were marked improvements in the sharpness when using the more expensive Zeiss 16-35mm f/2.8 lens, as opposed to the standard kit Sony 18-55mm SAM lens.
Sony A230 ISO quality
General ISO performance is very good with no significant sign of noise evident until ISO 800, and still fairly light noise at ISO 1600. The highest value of ISO 3200 does show far more chroma noise, though it is not excessive for a camera of this level and, by adding the noise reduction, is able to reduce it extensively, if at slight detriment to the level of detail.




Have your say!
Latest comments
October 06 01:24
Harrow
I think the prod price is good for what is does. I'd give it 4/5 stars. Its very light despite what the pic looks like: sony-alpha-a230l-10-2-mp-digital-slr-camera-with-super-steadyshot-inside-image-stabilization-and-18-product For the most part I think this is for the middle skilled user. Its too much for a beginner and too little for the pro. Thats not to say that the quality is off, its a fantastic quality piece, but just know that you must read up a bit to use it.
April 07 20:42
Michael McGrath
Being shortsighted always having to wear spetacles , I am simply delighted with the diopter control on this camera placed nicely beside the viewfinder. The moment I tested this in the shop against the competition, I knew that this is the only possible camera for me . There's a good diopter adjustment on my Fuji S2 Pro as well, but it's massively hefty and heavy compared to this camera, so I think I'll be carrying this one a lot more through the long hot summer forecast here in Ireland for 2010. I am also pleased with the Dynamic Range Optimiser feature on the Sony. I am hoping that either Sony or a third-party manufacturer provides an add-on rubber grip - that would be the making of this Sony Alpha 230 which I have only had for 24 hours and already find excellent, being a photographer for 44 years . I do like the rubberised covering over the body as well. I find this Sony DSLR to be better than the midrange Canons and the equal of Nikons up to, but not having the features of, the D90. But I don't want video on a still camera, live view would have been nice though I always use a viewfinder , and as I say, the diopter adjustment on this camera made my day ! I am delighted so far with my choice of the Sony Alpha 230, and will report back when I really put it through its paces .
February 02 20:47
colin
I HAVE HAD SONY A230 FOR AROUND 18 MONTH OLD IT HAS STARTED TO DEVELOP A FEW FAULTS 1 NO ANTI-SHAKE 2 NO SENSOR CLEANER 3 EVERY 8 - 1OTH SHOT THE MIRROR JAMS AND I GET CAMERA ERROR MORE RECENTLY MY SHOTS ARE NOT CENTERED WITH THE VIEW FINDER AND THE AUTO FOCUS WILL NOT WORKED FURTHER THAN AROUND 1O FEET. THE CAMERA IS ALMOST UNUSABLE AND SONY (UK) ARE NOT INTERESTED. 2 NO SENSOR CLEANER 3 EVERY 8 - 1OTH SHOT THE MIRROR JAMS AND I GET CAMERA ERROR MORE RECENTLY MY SHOTS ARE NOT i BOUGHT ONE OF THESECENTERED WITH THE VIEW FINDER AND THE AUTO FOCUS WILL NOT WORKED FURTHER THAN AROUND 1O FEET.
March 07 11:00
Peter Cain
find camera very good takes very good snaps macro shots brill very simple to use sports action very good very pleased with overall performance