Nikon COOLPIX P510 review
Image Quality and Verdict
Nikon COOLPIX P510 review - Image Quality
When a camera features an optical zoom as
audacious as that found on the P510, there is always the nagging doubt
that image quality may suffer as a result. However, the good news is
that predicted image quality flaws with the P510 are largely absent and
image quality is, on the whole, good.
On first look it's clear
that images display a good tonal range straight out of the camera, with
a good balance between shadow and highlights. Having said that, there
is a slight tendency for the P510 to underexpose, though as ever this is
preferable as it saves highlights from potentially blowing out.
The
model's white balance is generally reliable, although it does on
occasion err to the warm side of the scale. Colours on the whole are
generally comprised of a natural palette, although they also do have a
tendency to appear somewhat oversaturated.
The lens itself,
despite performing well in relation to its large focal range, does
exhibit a few issues. Lens flare is evident in harsh lighting
conditions, and can result in softening of fine detail at the tele end
of the zoom. Having said that, the lens offers a pleasing level of
sharpness right up to the corners of the frame.
ISO noise is
generally well controlled, with settings between ISO 100 to 400 all
eminently usable. When you head beyond this level, quality does drop off
with ISO grain appearing throughout the frame, although on the whole
the performance is on a par with similar bridge cameras.
Nikon COOLPIX P510 review - Verdict
There's
no denying in that if you decide to purchase the P510, you're going to
be getting an awful lot of camera for your money. The model also
performs well in use, mostly managing to sidestep any potential pitfalls
of having that massive 42x optical zoom. It's not without it's flaws -
it lacks Raw capture, the tiltable LCD screen could be better and build
quality is not the best. However, it's certainly one of the most
impressive bridge cameras currently available.





Have your say!
Latest comments
April 23 18:41
Ptolemy
I was looking forward to this model but from what I have seen the image quality doesn't match the Canon SX40HS. Think I'll go for the Canon.
April 29 12:50
John
The first thing that struck me is the lack of any manual zoom, which is essential when using the telephoto end of the lens. I've just purchased the Fuji X-S1 which granted,is more expensive and has a shorter zoom range, but with a 2/3-in sensor, full manual zoom and manual focus if required, will out perform the Nikon.
April 30 15:22
eddie
i have the sx40hs,the shutter lag is a bit slow if you are trying to catch fast moving objects.otherwise the colour and image quality is beautifull,also the digital zoom can produce some very usable pictures eddie
June 26 18:34
kenn
amazing! i love it. it's much handier than carrying my slr plus lenses and so much lighter if you're planning on doing any walking, etc.